Majority Rule, Exclusive Representation, and the Interests of Individual Workers: Should Exclusivity Be Abolished?
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Should The WTO Be Abolished?
Why? Because though the US, back in 1948, blocked the formation of an International Trade Organisation (ITO), believing that, at that time, the interests of its corporations would not be served by such a global body, it had changed its mind by the 1990s. Now it wanted an international trade body. Why? Because its global economic dominance was threatened. The flexible GATT (General Agreement on ...
متن کاملShould Intermittent Mandatory Ventilation Be Abolished?
Intermittent mandatory ventilation (IMV) was introduced nearly 50 years ago. Despite the initial fanfare and early adoption by many, the role of IMV continues to be questioned. The use of small tidal volumes complicates the application of IMV, and issues with work of breathing, weaning and lack of clear advantages have many calling for a moratorium on its use. Spontaneous breathing, however, ha...
متن کاملThe majority rule in individual decision making
This research investigates an understudied decision heuristic, the majority rule. By using the rule, decision makers choose the option superior on most of the available cues. Cues are broadly defined, including advisors and attributes. We propose that decision makers are more likely to use the majority rule when encouraged to employ intra-cue comparison as opposed to intra-option integration, a...
متن کاملThe ‘pay-to-publish’ model should be abolished
Scholarly journals have become increasingly expensive and unaffordable, whether for individuals or for libraries. This has been exacerbated by the enormous increase in the numbers of published articles and therefore in the per-capita consumption necessary for scholarly activity. The arrival of digital publishing and the Internet have magnified these numbers almost beyond imagination. Funders of...
متن کاملShould the patent system for new medicines be abolished?
“It is hard to think of many industries that have contributed as much to human welfare as the pharmaceutical industry.” This statement was made not by a pharmaceutical industry chief executive officer but by two antitrust regulators, Roy Levy and Abraham Wickelgren, with the Federal Trade Commission.1 There is indeed evidence from the medical and economics literature that new drugs have played ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: University of Pennsylvania Law Review
سال: 1975
ISSN: 0041-9907
DOI: 10.2307/3311553